PSU Code of Student Conduct and Responsibility

The University supports the right of all people to live and learn in a safe and respectful environment that promotes excellence in instruction, research, and public service. The Code of Student Conduct and Responsibility (“Code”) is is designed to protect the freedoms, fundamental rights, and responsibilities of those in the PSU community. Students are expected to conduct themselves in a manner consistent with these principles.

A Student Party whose conduct is determined incongruent with the standards of the University as described in this Code is subject to disciplinary action. The procedures for that action are generally educational in nature and are intended to lead to the preservation of community, self-evaluation, and accountability.
The procedures of this Code consider each case individually and without prejudice. Review of alleged conduct code violations shall be done in a prompt, fair, and impartial manner.
In addition to the regulations in this Code, all Student Parties must follow the academic and professional standards of all applicable academic units, departments, schools, and colleges.
This Code became effective on July 24, 2023 and supersedes all other previous student conduct codes.

II. Definitions

Appeal Officer: university official appointed to review appeals of Conduct outcomes and sanctions.
Code: this Code of Student Conduct and Responsibility.
Conduct Record: Records relating to reports of Code Violations, including, but not limited to, incident reports, final reports, notification of allegation, disciplinary reports, informal discussion notes, formal Conduct Review meeting records and recommendations, decision statements, appeal records and decision, and related documentation and correspondence.
Course Instructor: any person employed by the University to conduct classroom activities or who has an official instructional function with the University.
Day: any business day in which the University is open. It does not include weekends, federal and state holidays or days in which the University is not open for business.
Dean of Student Life: the University Official holding this title. Any action required to be performed by the Dean under this Code may be performed by their designee(s).
Conduct Officer: a University Official designated to adjudicate cases by the Senior Conduct Officer.
Effective Consent: voluntary, non-coerced and mutually understandable communication between adults, meeting the age requirements of the State of Oregon, indicating a willingness to participate in a particular act. Consent must be freely and actively given. Effective consent cannot be gained by actual or the threat of force, intimidation, or by taking advantage of incapacitation of another, where a person knows or reasonably should have known of such incapacitation. Silence, stillness, or the absence of “no” in and of itself is not an indication of consent. Consent can be withdrawn at any time. Past consent does not imply future consent.
Incapacitation: a state that renders a person incapable of determining their own conduct and/or lacking an understanding of the who, what, when, where, why, or how of their sexual interaction at the time of the incident. The causes of incapacitation may include but are not limited to a medical diagnosis, lack of sleep, blackouts, or influence of a controlled or other intoxicating substance that has rendered the individual physically or substantially incapable of making decisions or communicating unwillingness to engage in sexual activity.
Protected Class: a group of people who qualified for protection under PSU’s Prohibited Discrimination and Harassment policy based on particular identities. The protected classes covered include age, color, disability, gender, gender identity and expression, genetic information, marital status, national origin, pregnancy, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, veteran status, and any other basis protected by federal, state, or local law.
Rational Nexus: is the standard used in adjudicating behavior that originates or takes place off-campus. Criminal, violent, or other behavior that involves two (2) or more students or has the potential to impact the campus community may be subject to review and adjudication by the university.
Recognized Student Organization: a group of five or more Students who have formed around a defined mission or purpose and who have been officially recognized by Student Activities and Leadership Programs or Campus Recreation.
Report: reported allegations of code violations, including, but not limited to, a Dean of Student Life Conduct Report Form, Residence Life Incident Report, Campus Public Safety Office Incident Report, or Portland Police Bureau Report.
Reporter: any person submitting a report alleging that a Student, group of students, or Recognized Student Organization has engaged in conduct prohibited by this Code.
Respondent: is a Student who is alleged to have engaged in conduct prohibited by the Code.
Senior Conduct Officer: is the University Official charged with the responsibility of administering the Code. The Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards is the senior conduct officer for PSU. Any action required to be performed under this Code by the Senior Conduct Officer may be performed by their designee.
Student Conduct Committee (Committee): a committee charged with reviewing and adjudicating allegations of Code Violations. The committee is composed of faculty and staff recommended by the Faculty Senate of the University. Quorum for the committee will be Three (3) members, including the Chair.
Student: a person who: (a) is enrolled and/or registered for one or more credit hours; (b) is enrolled in a special non-credit program approved by the University; or (c) was enrolled as a student the term prior to the incident, and is eligible to return or have a continuing relationship with the university, or (d) has applied for admission, financial aid or any other service provided by the University that requires student status in the same term as, or one term prior to, the incident.
Student Party: a Student, group of Students, or Recognized Student Organization to which this Code applies.
University: Portland State University, or any part, program, department, or division within Portland State University.
University Official: any person performing assigned administrative or professional responsibilities on behalf of the University.
University Premises: all lands, buildings, facilities, and other property owned, in the possession of, used, or controlled by the University.
University Sponsored Activity: any program or event hosted by a department, program, organization, or individual representing the University. Such activities include, but are not limited to, field trips, athletic events, education abroad, University exchange programs, and student organization-hosted programs or events.

III. General Statement of Authority

As provided in PSU’s Student Conduct and Responsibility policy, the Senior Conduct Officer will maintain overall responsibility for developing and implementing policies for the administration of the Code and procedural rules for conduct meetings and Committee Conduct Review meetings that are consistent with provisions of the Code and applicable law.
The Senior Conduct Officer will review all reports received of alleged violations of this Code and has sole discretion to determine jurisdiction, if adjudication is appropriate, and the appropriate review body or University Official for adjudication.

IV. Jurisdiction

The provisions of this Code apply to all Students and activities on University Premises; during any University Sponsored Activity regardless of location; and to off-campus conduct that has a rational nexus to the University and/or the pursuit of its objectives or that poses a potential threat to the health, safety, or assets of the University or any person associated with the University or substantially impacts any person’s ability to continue their University-related pursuits. Questions regarding jurisdiction will be resolved by the Senior Conduct Officer.
Students participating in co-admission programs between Portland State University and other institutions will be accountable to conduct standards at Portland State University regardless of the standards applicable at the other institution and whether or not the other institution is reviewing allegations under their policy.
Allegations of certain behavior may be adjudicated within the University’s administrative conduct program as outlined in this Code as well as within any off-campus criminal justice system. Adjudication of allegations of misconduct for Student Parties will occur expediently without regard to the status of any off-campus adjudication.
Generally, allegations may be adjudicated up to six months from the date of report of the alleged violation regardless of their current enrollment status. However, in extenuating circumstances, the Senior Conduct Officer may determine that adjudication is appropriate beyond the six-month time limit, in their sole discretion. An adjudicated violation of a prior or inactive student may result in a notation on the permanent record or degree revocation if the Student has separated from the University.

V. Conduct Prohibited by Portland State University

The following constitutes conduct as prohibited by the university for which a party is subject to disciplinary action:

Academic Misconduct: actual or attempted, fraud, deceit, unauthorized use of materials prohibited or inappropriate in the context of the academic assignment, or any act that aims to achieve an unfair academic advantage. Unless otherwise specified by the faculty member, all submissions, whether in draft or final form, must either be the Student’s own work, or must clearly acknowledge the source(s). Academic Misconduct includes, but is not limited to:
1. cheating, such as copying the work of another, allowing another to copy from one’s own work, unauthorized use of notes or sources during an exam, giving or receiving unauthorized information prior to or during the examination.
2. plagiarism, such as word for word copying, using borrowed words or phrases from original text into new patterns without attribution, or paraphrasing another writer’s ideas;
3. the buying or selling of all or any portion of course assignments and research papers;
4. performing academic assignments (including tests and examinations) in another person’s stead;
5. unauthorized disclosure or receipt of academic information;
6. falsification of research data, sources, or other information represented in an academic assignment;
7. unauthorized collaboration;
8. using the same paper or data for several assignments or courses without proper documentation;
9. unauthorized alteration of student records; and
10. academic sabotage, such as destroying or obstructing another student’s work.
1. Possession or consumption of alcohol beverages by persons under 21 years of age, or furnishing of alcoholic beverages to persons under 21 years, on University Premises or at any University Sponsored Activity.
2. The illegal use, possession or distribution of any federally controlled substances, synthetic drugs or inhalants, and natural substances used for drug effects. This includes any misuse or distribution of prescription or over the counter medications.
1. falsification, distortion or misrepresentation of information before any conduct body;
2. knowingly initiating any conduct proceedings without cause; or
3. attempting to discourage an individual's participation in, or use of, any conduct system.
1. Unwanted communication with another person using computers, email, cell phones, or any other digital device.
2. Abuse, misuse, and/or theft of data, equipment, or software, including unauthorized file sharing, distribution of electronic materials, creating or presenting false information, whether as a hoax, to incite fear, or to embarrass, harass, or ridicule another person.
3. Hacking: Unauthorized entry into any off-campus, University-owned, or University-controlled network or other online space.
4. Illegal download: Use of any University-owned or controlled network to illegally download any material that is under copyright or other ownership.
5. Surveillance: Recording, streaming, or viewing another person without consent through the use of electronic, digital, or online devices, including sharing such materials with others
1. Sexual Harassment: unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment includes sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal comments, non-verbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature, where such conduct is sufficiently severe or pervasive that it has the effect, intended or unintended, of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s academic performance, interferes with an individual’s access to University Services, Programs, or activities, or creates an intimidating, hostile environment. Examples of inappropriate behavior include: sexual or derogatory comments; grabbing or touching parts of the body; and sending letters, notes, cartoons, emails, text, or audio messages of a sexually suggestive nature. Sexual harassment does not refer to occasional compliments of a socially acceptable nature. Sexual Harassment includes, but is broader than, Title IX Sexual Harassment. Title IX Sexual Harassment is the specific form of Sexual Harassment that is regulated under Title IX of the Amended Education Act of 1972, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in PSU’s education programs or activities. The procedures that apply to this form of Sexual Harassment are found in PSU’s Title IX Policy. Whether Title IX Sexual Harassment processes apply may depend on when and where the behavior occurred and the connection of the involved parties to PSU. Sexual harassment includes a host of behaviors, only a few of which are defined here. Many of these behaviors involve the absence of Effective Consent, including instances in which a person is incapacitated. Some additional behaviors that constitute Sexual Harassment include the following:
  1. Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment: Making submission to unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature explicitly or implicitly as a term or condition of an individual’s employment or educational experience. This may include employment, salary, or other benefit changes affecting an employee, or as a basis for educational decisions or benefits affecting a student.
  2. Dating Violence: Sexual violence or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse, on the basis of sex, committed by a person who is in or has been in a “social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature” with the Complainant. PSU determines whether such a relationship exists by considering the Complainant’s statement and the length of the relationship, the type of relationship, and the frequency of interaction between the people involved.
  3. Domestic Violence: Sexual violence or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse, on the basis of sex, committed by a student who is a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the Complainant, or shares a child in common with the Complainant, or is cohabitating with, or has cohabitated with, the Complainant as a spouse or intimate partner, or is similarly situated to a spouse of the Complainant under the domestic or family violence laws of Oregon. The relationship between the student and the Complainant is more than just two people living together as roommates.
  4. Fondling: The touching of the private parts of another person, without the consent of the other person, including instances where the other person is incapable of giving consent because of their age or because of their temporary or permanent mental incapacity.
  5. Incest: Sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by law.
  6. Rape: The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.
  7. Sexual Assault: Any sexual act directed against another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim was incapable of giving Effective Consent.
  8. Sexual Exploitation: This means that a student takes non-consensual or abusive sexual advantage of another for their own advantage or benefit or to benefit another person. Examples of Sexual Exploitation include, but are not limited to: invasion of sexual privacy, taking or transmitting photographs of a sexual nature without consent, engaging in voyeurism, exposing one’s genitals in non-consensual circumstances, prostituting another person, or inducing incapacitation with the intent to commit other acts of sexual misconduct.
  9. Stalking: Engaging in a “course of conduct” (two or more acts, including, but not limited to acts in which the student directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means), follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person, or interferes with a person’s property; on the basis of sex, directed at a specific person, that would cause a reasonable person to fear for the person’s safety, or the safety of others; or suffer substantial emotional distress, which includes anguish that may, but does not necessarily require, medical or other professional treatment or counseling.
  10. Statutory Rape: Sexual intercourse with a person who is under the statutory age of consent as defined by the laws of the State of Oregon.
  VI. Interim Measures
  1. When the health and safety of a member of the PSU Community is at risk, the Dean of Student Life or the Senior Conduct Officer may take emergency action to implement Interim Measures at their discretion. Students will be provided written notice of the Interim Measure(s), including justification for the determination and opportunity to contest the determination. Interim Measures may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following:
    1. immediate interim suspension of the Student;
    2. exclusion from University Premises or any portion thereof;
    3. loss of any of the privileges of being a Student;
    4. mandating completion by the Student of an assessment by a qualified professional and compliance with the recommendations of the professional; or
    5. any other action determined to be reasonable due to the circumstances.
    VII. Student Conduct Procedures
    1. Report and Intake Process:
      1. Any person may submit a written report to the Senior Conduct Officer alleging that a Student Party has engaged in conduct prohibited by this Code.
      2. The Senior Conduct Officer will review all reports received by the Dean of Student Life Office to determine, in their sole discretion, if there are sufficient grounds to proceed under this policy with a Conduct Review. The Senior Conduct officer may proceed with a Conduct Review regardless of if there is a specific complainant or the complainant is non-participatory.
      3. It is within the Senior Conduct Officer’s authority to place a hold on transcripts pending the outcome of a Conduct Review or committee Conduct Review meeting in order to preserve the record and allow for the completion of the process.
      4. Timelines:
        
        Any allegation should be submitted as soon as possible after the event takes place. Where reports are submitted more than ninety (90) days after the alleged conduct, the University may have limited ability to review and address the matter due to the availability and credibility of witnesses and evidence. It is at the sole discretion of the Senior Conduct Officer to determine if a review is appropriate beyond the ninety (90) day period considering the severity of the allegations, available supporting evidence, due process rights, and impact of the allegations on the PSU community.
        
        The University is substantially limited in its ability to review and address reports of conduct where the alleged behavior occurred more than six months prior. While the Senior Conduct Officer will review the report for severity of the allegations, available supporting evidence, due process rights, and impact of the allegations on the PSU community, they may also maintain the report as a record and refer the reporting/impacted parties to resources and support services.
        
        Senior Conduct Officer or Designee
        
        If the Senior Conduct Officer hears the case, the Senior Conduct Officer will facilitate the Conduct Review procedures and may decide the matter based on the available information. All meetings before the Senior Conduct Officer are closed, and the information and supporting documents presented are confidential except as required by law or policy. The Conduct Review meeting is informal and does not follow administrative contested case or courtroom procedures, including formal rules of evidence. It will be at the discretion of the Senior Conduct Officer to review information brought forward by any party involved and determine if it will be considered as a part of the Conduct Review. All information and documentation associated should be submitted prior to the close of a review. Supplemental information submitted after the review should be submitted at least 24hrs in advance of the Conduct Review meeting.
        
        Allegations, including any known or approximate date, time, location, and summary of the alleged behavior,
        
        a list of the specific section(s) of this Code allegedly violated,
        
        the assigned Adjudicating Body,
        
        summary of student rights, and
        
        information on the policy and procedures.
        
        The Conduct Review meeting will be scheduled in coordination with the student and the Adjudicating Body. If the student fails to participate in coordinating scheduling or fails to appear at a scheduled Conduct Review meeting, the Senior Conduct Officer may determine that the student has opted not to participate and may proceed with the review without the student’s participation. Failure to cooperate or appear will not delay the disposition of the matter.
        
        The Respondent may bring up to two (2) third party advisors of their choice and may be a family member, friend, advisor, attorney, or other trusted individual. The advisor may not be an individual who was involved in, or witness to, the alleged violation. Delays will not normally be allowed due to the scheduling conflicts of an advisor. The Respondent will be expected to speak for themselves at all times and may only use the advisor for consultation or support. Advisors are not generally permitted to speak or participate directly in the Committee Review meeting. Should a Respondent elect to have an attorney serve as an advisor, they must notify the Senior Conduct Officer at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. The University assumes no responsibility for any costs associated with such representation.
        
        The only parties permitted to be present during the Committee Review meeting are:
        
        The Respondent,
        
        The Respondent’s advisor(s),
        
        Witnesses invited by the Senior Conduct Officer, for the portions in which they are providing relevant information,
        
        The Adjudicating Body,
        
        The Senior Conduct Officer, when not acting as the Adjudicating Body, and
        
        Campus Legal Counsel, where determined appropriate by the Senior Conduct Officer.
        
        The Recognized Student Organization or group shall designate the president, principal officer, or other student member to act on behalf of the organization. This designee shall be afforded all procedural rights and responsibilities in accordance with the provisions of this Code and shall be required to represent the group at all applicable stages of the judicial program.
        
        Where allegations against a Recognized Student Organization may also constitute allegations of misconduct by individuals who are part of that organization, the Senior Conduct Officer may, at their sole discretion, apply these procedures to allegations against individuals prior to, concurrently, or following a conduct review of the allegations against the organization. Reports against unrecognized student groups will follow the procedures as outlined for recognized student organizations or groups.
        
        The Title IX Coordinator determines the case does not fall under Title IX jurisdiction.
        
        The Senior Conduct Officer receives the case from the Title IX Coordinator for consideration.
        
        After consideration, the Senior Conduct Officer determines if a review based on the allegations will occur.
        
        When the Senior Conduct Officer through this process determines that a case requires a review, the process will proceed as follows:
        
        If a report alleges facts that would constitute a sex violation, including stalking, dating or domestic violence, sexual harassment, sexual exploitation, non-consensual sexual contact, and non-consensual sexual intercourse, or violate the University’s Prohibited Discrimination and Harassment Policy, the Complainant and Respondent will be provided with equivalent opportunities to present relevant witnesses, documents and information during the review and, to participate during any Conduct Review meetings or other proceedings. This includes an opportunity to participate in any granted Conduct Review meeting and request an appeal to the decision thereafter.
        
        If in the course of a report of sexual misconduct, a violation of the Alcohol and Other Drugs section of the code (such as underage drinking) was reported, the University will not pursue formal adjudication of said violation if the Senior Conduct Officer determines that the Report related to sexual misconduct is brought forward in good faith.
        
        Course Instructors have the primary responsibility and purview for responding to and reporting academic misconduct by students enrolled in their respective courses.
        
        Course Instructors may issue a zero or a failing grade for the assignment for which the misconduct was found. Course Instructors may not issue a failing grade for the course unless a failing grade on the assignment in question results in a failing grade for the course, per the syllabus. Instructors may not administratively remove a student from a course.
        
        Outcomes and findings in the conduct process are separate from grading. Grades are given at the discretion and review of faculty and are not dependent on the outcome of the Conduct Review; Course Instructors are not required to wait for the determination of a Conduct Review prior to assigning grades. In the case where the Course Instructor’s assessment differs from the outcome of the Conduct Review, a Course Instructor is not obligated to adjust the grade assigned to the academic assignment, though they may choose to do so at their sole discretion.
        
        Referral for the purpose of maintaining a record. Absent a prior conduct history, a Course Instructor may address the behavior via in-class instruction, counseling of the student, and grading adjustments. A record of such interventions would be maintained by the Senior Conduct Officer without adjudication under this Code.
        
        Review of the allegations and adjudication under this Code alongside any grading decision made by the Course Instructor.
        
        VIII. Appeals
        
        Where an allegation(s) is substantiated, the Student Party will be afforded the right to file an appeal of the outcome based on the following grounds:
        
        new information that was not available at the time of the original Conduct Review meeting;
        
        a demonstration that the sanction(s) imposed were outside of the University’s authority; or
        
        demonstrated errors in the conduct process.
        
        Justifications described in (a) or (c) will not be a basis for sustaining an appeal unless the deviation would have materially affected the decision of the Committee or the Senior Conduct Officer.
        
        IX. Fees and Restitution
        
        A Student Party that has been determined to have violated the Code may be assessed a conduct fee for each case resulting in one or more substantiated allegations. For each case in which a Student Party is determined to have violated the Code, a conduct fee will be imposed in the following increments:
        
        First substantiated violation: $10 conduct fee
        
        Second substantiated violation: $25 conduct fee
        
        Third, and any subsequent, substantiated violation: $50 conduct fee
        
        Students with limited financial resources or who may be disproportionately impacted by fees may file a request for a fee waiver for each case in which a fee is imposed. Any fee waiver request is approved at the discretion of the Senior Conduct Officer.
        
        X. Sanctions
        
        Student Parties whose behavior violates this Code may be subject to one or more sanctions, including, but not limited to:
        
        Mediation: Participation in a facilitated discussion about the matter with an option to move forward with a discussion with the Complainant. Mediation involving a Complainant is not an appropriate sanction in a case involving a sex violation as described in the code.
        
        Mandated Assessments: Completion of evaluation(s) and following the recommendations of a qualified professional for treatment and/or education.
        
        Restitution: Those responsible may be required to make monetary restitution, return any stolen or misappropriated property, or provide services to the University or a member of the University community in accordance with the nature of the violation and in an amount not to exceed the actual expenses, damages, or losses incurred.
        
        Educational Assignment: Complete specific assignments or render a designated number of hours of specified service to the University or the community.
        
        Community Service: This service can be mandated for on and off-campus related projects and service needs as a result of a Conduct Review outcome.
        
        Disciplinary Probation: Constitutes a period of time during which additional violations of the Code will result in sanctions of increased severity. Upon expiration of the period of probation and fulfillment of other sanctions imposed, if any, the Student’s disciplinary probation will be lifted.
        
        Social Probation: Establishes a fixed period of time, not less than one term, in which a student/organization may not be permitted to represent the University or participate in any University, extracurricular, athletic, or other activities. The specifics of the social probation will vary based upon the violation and the individual Student’s circumstances. For example, a Student may be restricted and allowed to participate only in activities directly related to academic pursuits and only be permitted to enter buildings necessary for the completion of academic requirements. Students on social probation may be restricted from attending or purchasing tickets for certain events sponsored by the University including, but not limited to, athletic events, concerts, SALP programs, intramurals, off-campus trips, etc.
        
        No Contact Order: An order of “No Contact” with another student, faculty member, staff member or University Official. In this case, a Student Party may be required to organize their on-campus activities in order to avoid contact with designated individuals.
        
        Registration and/or Transcript Hold: Students who are suspended, expelled, or have not completed assigned sanctions within the time provided may be prevented from registering for classes until completion of those sanctions.
        
        Exclusion from the University Premises or any portion thereof: Exclusion from the entirety of campus may also be accompanied by a registration hold.
        
        Suspension: Loss of the right to be an enrolled student at the University for a specific period of time. Suspended Students are not eligible for the privileges and services provided to currently enrolled students, including but not limited to residing in University-owned student housing, registering, attending class, or using other University services or facilities. The suspension may be specified for any length of time.
        
        If a student is suspended, tuition and fees associated with the administrative withdrawal process are the responsibility of the student.
        
        If the pending conduct Conduct Review meeting or appeal may result in suspension, award of the academic degree sought may be postponed pending the outcome of the Conduct Review meeting.
        
        Upon expiration of the period of suspension, if the Senior Conduct Officer certifies that all the terms of the suspension have been met, the suspension will be lifted. The student may then register for courses through the regular process, contingent on the completion and/or satisfaction of all sanctions and satisfaction of general admission and registration requirements.
        
        A notation of “Disciplinary Suspension” may be entered on the student’s transcript for the duration of the suspension. After the suspension period is complete and all other conditions, if any, have been satisfied, the Senior Conduct Officer will notify the Registrar’s Office to lift the Registration Hold, and the notation may be removed from the transcript.
        
        XI. Records
        
        All reports that result in formal adjudication, regardless of outcome, and any cases substantiated through adjudication resulting in a warning involve the creation of a Conduct Record for the Student Party. These records are generally treated as confidential and accessible only to the Respondent, appropriate University Officials, and other entities as required by law and are not disclosed on conduct record checks.
        
        Any cases resulting in formal Reprimand or Disciplinary probation are maintained as a Conduct Record for the Student Party. These records are generally treated as confidential and accessible only to the Respondent, those whom the Respondent signs a FERPA waiver for disclosure on conduct records checks, and appropriate University Officials and other entities as required by law. These records are maintained by the appropriate administrator/office for a period of seven (7) years from the date of the outcome notice.
        
        Opportunity for Restoration of Records:
        
        No sooner than two (2) years following the outcome notice, students may apply to have their case reviewed for possible restoration prior to the seven-year period.
        
        Students applying for restoration may be required to engage in additional educational assignments, and meet all requirements of those assignments, prior to approval.
        
        Approval is at the discretion of the Senior Conduct Officer. Cases resulting in suspension or expulsion and those involving allegations of violence, harassment, or any allegations under Title IX are not eligible for restoration.
        
        XII. Interpretation and Revision
        
        Any question of interpretation regarding the Code must be referred to the Senior Conduct Officer for final determination.
        
        The Code should be reviewed annually or as determined appropriate by the Senior Conduct Officer and are adopted after a thirty (30) day review and posting period.
        
        *Cases adjudicated prior to July 24, 2023 will fall under the prior version of the Code.

PSU Code of Student Conduct and Responsibility

II. Definitions

III. General Statement of Authority

IV. Jurisdiction

V. Conduct Prohibited by Portland State University

VI. Interim Measures

VII. Student Conduct Procedures

VIII. Appeals

IX. Fees and Restitution

X. Sanctions

XI. Records

XII. Interpretation and Revision